<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Enigma called Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.telecomcircle.com/2009/08/the-enigma-called-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.telecomcircle.com/2009/08/the-enigma-called-twitter/</link>
	<description>Telecom Circle analyses the latest trends and services within the Wireless and Internet space.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:03:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Philpott</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomcircle.com/2009/08/the-enigma-called-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-984</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Philpott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomcircle.com/?p=978#comment-984</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s an article in Time magazine that is exactly what I believe will not work with regard to advertising.  

http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1919994,00.html/

If anyone I followed started tweeting adverts I&#039;d quickly &#039;un-follow&#039; (incidentally, isn&#039;t it great how we have to invent new words for this new world?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an article in Time magazine that is exactly what I believe will not work with regard to advertising.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1919994,00.html/" rel="nofollow">http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1919994,00.html/</a></p>
<p>If anyone I followed started tweeting adverts I&#8217;d quickly &#8216;un-follow&#8217; (incidentally, isn&#8217;t it great how we have to invent new words for this new world?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navrang</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomcircle.com/2009/08/the-enigma-called-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-976</link>
		<dc:creator>Navrang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomcircle.com/?p=978#comment-976</guid>
		<description>Hey Mohit,

Really interesting post, off-late I&#039;ve been reading such posts. I also read a survey mentioning &quot;around 50% of twits are garbage &amp; has no use&quot;....

But, I&#039;m too sure that Twitter people come forward with twitting idea... ;-) for their revenue generation.


Regards
Navrang
http://navrangblog.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mohit,</p>
<p>Really interesting post, off-late I&#8217;ve been reading such posts. I also read a survey mentioning &#8220;around 50% of twits are garbage &amp; has no use&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
<p>But, I&#8217;m too sure that Twitter people come forward with twitting idea&#8230; <img src='http://www.telecomcircle.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  for their revenue generation.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Navrang<br />
<a href="http://navrangblog.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://navrangblog.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cross-Culture Tweets &#8211; Week 35 of 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomcircle.com/2009/08/the-enigma-called-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-974</link>
		<dc:creator>Cross-Culture Tweets &#8211; Week 35 of 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomcircle.com/?p=978#comment-974</guid>
		<description>[...] The Enigma called Twitter &#8211; with some interesting projections into the future [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Enigma called Twitter &#8211; with some interesting projections into the future [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Philpott</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomcircle.com/2009/08/the-enigma-called-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-969</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Philpott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomcircle.com/?p=978#comment-969</guid>
		<description>My opinions about the potential revenue streams you have identified are as follows:

- Advertising on the SMS alert would be or in the twitter stream would either reduce the space available for the tweet or would require a second SMS or tweet.  It would require high click through rates to be regarded as effective and these are notoriously difficult to attain / maintain.

- I don&#039;t see what e-commerce model Twitter offers that is not already provided by other means.  It looks like they&#039;ve missed the boat on this, at least for now.

- Data mining raises all sorts of privacy issues.  To the extent that regulation would allow this, I can see it being highly valued

- Fremium is counter-intuitive.  Setting a threshold for the number of free tweets will just throttle usage.  While this might be a useful cost constraining measure I don&#039;t see it as a big revenue generator.  For corporates, why bother customising your twitter page when your home page is just one click away?

- SMS revenue share would require Twitter to boss the operators into some sort of deal &amp; I&#039;m not sure it has the clout to do so.  Operators are getting all the revenue at the moment, why would they want to share it?

- Revenue share for applications has potential but requires a change from the current open philosophy.  However, I believe this would be achievable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opinions about the potential revenue streams you have identified are as follows:</p>
<p>- Advertising on the SMS alert would be or in the twitter stream would either reduce the space available for the tweet or would require a second SMS or tweet.  It would require high click through rates to be regarded as effective and these are notoriously difficult to attain / maintain.</p>
<p>- I don&#8217;t see what e-commerce model Twitter offers that is not already provided by other means.  It looks like they&#8217;ve missed the boat on this, at least for now.</p>
<p>- Data mining raises all sorts of privacy issues.  To the extent that regulation would allow this, I can see it being highly valued</p>
<p>- Fremium is counter-intuitive.  Setting a threshold for the number of free tweets will just throttle usage.  While this might be a useful cost constraining measure I don&#8217;t see it as a big revenue generator.  For corporates, why bother customising your twitter page when your home page is just one click away?</p>
<p>- SMS revenue share would require Twitter to boss the operators into some sort of deal &amp; I&#8217;m not sure it has the clout to do so.  Operators are getting all the revenue at the moment, why would they want to share it?</p>
<p>- Revenue share for applications has potential but requires a change from the current open philosophy.  However, I believe this would be achievable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Stein</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomcircle.com/2009/08/the-enigma-called-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-963</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomcircle.com/?p=978#comment-963</guid>
		<description>Very interesting ideas about revenue generation.

I am very curious, that the hacked financials show gross margin and net earnings that exce gross revenue in &#039;09. Also that Twitter&#039;s first full year of earnings, 2010, shows a total of $140 M. Hmm 140, does that ring a bell? So might this be a hoax? Has anyone checked into this?

Anyway, Twitter can easily become profitable with Ads, and SMS revenue sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting ideas about revenue generation.</p>
<p>I am very curious, that the hacked financials show gross margin and net earnings that exce gross revenue in &#8217;09. Also that Twitter&#8217;s first full year of earnings, 2010, shows a total of $140 M. Hmm 140, does that ring a bell? So might this be a hoax? Has anyone checked into this?</p>
<p>Anyway, Twitter can easily become profitable with Ads, and SMS revenue sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edgardo Domínguez</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomcircle.com/2009/08/the-enigma-called-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>Edgardo Domínguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomcircle.com/?p=978#comment-962</guid>
		<description>I originally reed this article over the Telecom Professionals Group over LinkedIn (http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&amp;gid=23013&amp;trk=anet_ug_hm)

Reading about the article and with some of my thoughts I bet that the SMS Revenue share could be the right scenario, followed by the advertising schema. Taking in account the quota of each posting system (Desktop app vs. Mobile app), the SMS Revenue is most likely to be true in the future, leaving the Adv for the Desktop/Web experience as a plus. 

That was my idea for the most likely business model in the first place, but an idea caught my mind remembering the Celltick platform which is used by MNOs to &quot;sell&quot; advertising which is displayed in the customers&#039; ME from an applet in the SIM via OTA. Having a huge user base, It could very simple to them to generate revenue from that kind of scenario.

So, In my opinion, both scenarios are quite possible, being the SMS Revenue sharing more likely for being more &quot;user friendly&quot;, lets say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I originally reed this article over the Telecom Professionals Group over LinkedIn (<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&amp;gid=23013&amp;trk=anet_ug_hm" rel="nofollow">http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&amp;gid=23013&amp;trk=anet_ug_hm</a>)</p>
<p>Reading about the article and with some of my thoughts I bet that the SMS Revenue share could be the right scenario, followed by the advertising schema. Taking in account the quota of each posting system (Desktop app vs. Mobile app), the SMS Revenue is most likely to be true in the future, leaving the Adv for the Desktop/Web experience as a plus. </p>
<p>That was my idea for the most likely business model in the first place, but an idea caught my mind remembering the Celltick platform which is used by MNOs to &#8220;sell&#8221; advertising which is displayed in the customers&#8217; ME from an applet in the SIM via OTA. Having a huge user base, It could very simple to them to generate revenue from that kind of scenario.</p>
<p>So, In my opinion, both scenarios are quite possible, being the SMS Revenue sharing more likely for being more &#8220;user friendly&#8221;, lets say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for The Enigma called Twitter &#124; Telecom Circle [telecomcircle.com] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomcircle.com/2009/08/the-enigma-called-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for The Enigma called Twitter &#124; Telecom Circle [telecomcircle.com] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomcircle.com/?p=978#comment-961</guid>
		<description>[...] link is being shared on Twitter right now. @telecomcircle said New blog post: The Enigma called Twitter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] link is being shared on Twitter right now. @telecomcircle said New blog post: The Enigma called Twitter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Feeney</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomcircle.com/2009/08/the-enigma-called-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-965</link>
		<dc:creator>John Feeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomcircle.com/?p=978#comment-965</guid>
		<description>Who to make capital.  Nice piece...funny how we&#039;re focused on &quot;forecasts&quot;.

Some thoughts:

Advertising - the idea of follow-up tweets behind yours was past around.   Advertisers could &quot;bid&quot; for that space.   But the review of Users activity is unexpectedly LOW - &lt; 40% retention {after a month}  

Monetize Data Mining - hold off on anything that sells user data, GOOGLE.

Freenium - OEM the service, an application Corporations can set procedures for proper use.

Valuation - Facebook offered $500 Million?  Please tell me it was all paper, cause if it was cash......   

Twitter&#039;s biggest prize is having Fortune 100 / 500 companines finally come up with a plan to make effort at capturing a way to better Service Clients.   Enterprise Customers is the Target.  When Salesforce.com crossed the barrier and customized their &quot;On Line&quot; solution, Major firms signed on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who to make capital.  Nice piece&#8230;funny how we&#8217;re focused on &#8220;forecasts&#8221;.</p>
<p>Some thoughts:</p>
<p>Advertising &#8211; the idea of follow-up tweets behind yours was past around.   Advertisers could &#8220;bid&#8221; for that space.   But the review of Users activity is unexpectedly LOW &#8211; &lt; 40% retention {after a month}  </p>
<p>Monetize Data Mining &#8211; hold off on anything that sells user data, GOOGLE.</p>
<p>Freenium &#8211; OEM the service, an application Corporations can set procedures for proper use.</p>
<p>Valuation &#8211; Facebook offered $500 Million?  Please tell me it was all paper, cause if it was cash&#8230;&#8230;   </p>
<p>Twitter&#039;s biggest prize is having Fortune 100 / 500 companines finally come up with a plan to make effort at capturing a way to better Service Clients.   Enterprise Customers is the Target.  When Salesforce.com crossed the barrier and customized their &quot;On Line&quot; solution, Major firms signed on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Enigma called Twitter &#124; Telecom Circle &#171; aneas.net</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomcircle.com/2009/08/the-enigma-called-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-960</link>
		<dc:creator>The Enigma called Twitter &#124; Telecom Circle &#171; aneas.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomcircle.com/?p=978#comment-960</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posts about social media as of August 25, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomcircle.com/2009/08/the-enigma-called-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>Posts about social media as of August 25, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomcircle.com/?p=978#comment-958</guid>
		<description>[...] gathering over 1.2 million followers on Twitter and 123,000 fans on Facebook in the process.   The Enigma called Twitter &#8211; telecomcircle.com 08/25/2009 Nobody thought that Twitter would be so successful but then [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gathering over 1.2 million followers on Twitter and 123,000 fans on Facebook in the process.   The Enigma called Twitter &#8211; telecomcircle.com 08/25/2009 Nobody thought that Twitter would be so successful but then [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posts about Gizmodo as of August 25, 2009 &#187; The Daily Parr</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomcircle.com/2009/08/the-enigma-called-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Posts about Gizmodo as of August 25, 2009 &#187; The Daily Parr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomcircle.com/?p=978#comment-959</guid>
		<description>[...] about Gizmodo as of August 25, 2009   The Enigma called Twitter - telecomcircle.com 08/25/2009 Nobody thought that Twitter would be so successful but then nobody [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about Gizmodo as of August 25, 2009   The Enigma called Twitter &#8211; telecomcircle.com 08/25/2009 Nobody thought that Twitter would be so successful but then nobody [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
